Payden McRoberts
PL SCI 150
Professor Hawkins
November 1, 2012
Blog 7: Duverger’s Law
Does the
effective amount of parties in a country coalesce based on its electoral rules?
Duverger’s Law states that the number of parties is a direct result of the rule
systems for the electorate in the lower chamber of the legislature in any given
country. Thus, according to Duverger, if a nation espouses single-member
district plurality (SMDP), it should have only two effective parties, while
proportional representation systems should allow for multiple effective
parties. France
is a challenging nation when it comes to testing this law, because it has three
effective parties, even though its electoral system is SMDP
(Inter-Parliamentary Union). However, upon closer inspection, it is clear that
the mathematics used to calculate the effective number of parties are slightly
skewed due to the coalition of “Other left-wing parties.”
This
formula for choosing elected officials supports the formation of large parties
or party coalitions, as it requires a majority in any one constituency to gain
even a single seat. While this may allow for the empowerment of certain small,
regionally-based parties, it is still clearly an SMDP formula. The system is
not a hybrid, because there are no elements of proportional representation
involved in the selection process. In addition, as an SMDP system, the
electoral system in France
has an open list ballot, where each vote goes toward the candidate themselves, and
the candidate list order is not chosen by the party. There are no
thresholds—any party may run in the elections, though to make it to the second
round, a party does need to receive at least 12.5 percent of the vote in the
first round (Inter-Parliamentary Union).
Thus it is
clear that the French Assemblé Nationale follows
the forms of a single-member district plurality system. Duverger’s Law would
predict that the parliamentary system of France should have only two
effective parties. However, using the data provided by the Inter-Parliamentary
Union’s Parline Database, I have found that there are in reality three
effective parties, using the effective party formula. Below is a table
representing the fourteen different parties that received seats in the most
recent election and the number of seats that they won between the two rounds,
as well as the proportion of seats that they won.
Party
|
# of Seats
|
Proportions
|
Socialist Party
|
258
|
.45
|
185
|
.32
|
|
Other left wing parties
|
21
|
.04
|
Europe-Ecology-The Greens
|
16
|
.03
|
Other parties of the right
|
14
|
.02
|
New Centre
|
11
|
.02
|
Left Radical
|
11
|
.02
|
Left Front
|
10
|
.02
|
Radical Party
|
6
|
.01
|
Regionalist
|
2
|
.003
|
The Centre for
|
2
|
.003
|
National Front
|
2
|
.003
|
Centrist
|
2
|
.003
|
Far Right
|
1
|
.002
|
The
effective number of parties in a country can be expressed in the following
formula:
Neff =
1 / Σ(proportions)2
Which gives us
Neff = 1 /
(.45) + (.32) + (.04) + (.03) + 4(.02) + (.01) + 4(.003) + (.002) = 3.23
It would
seem, in this case, that France ’s
system has three effective parties, rather than two, which would disprove
Duverger’s Law. However, upon closer inspection, it is easy to see that the
Socialist Party and Union for a Popular
Movement have the lion’s share of the seats, whereas the third party by
proportion is actually a coalition of “Other left wing parties.” Thus, even
though the math states that there are three effective parties, these
calculations are skewed by the other left wing parties’ grouping into a single
party. Thus, Duverger’s Law is proved by the system in France , which follows SMDP rules,
causing the presence of two major parties.
REFERENCES
Inter-Parliamentary
Union . Parline database: France . http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2113.htm
(accessed November 1, 2012).
It is interesting that there is such a diversity of political parties holding seats in the legislature there. I did Russia with a proportional system and there were only four parties with seats which seems a stark contrast to France.
ReplyDeleteI especially like the ending paragraph, it showed that you put effort into looking at why, rather than just what. Great Blog!
ReplyDelete