Suhwan (Alma)
Seo
Poli Sci 150
Professor
Hawkins
November 19,
2012
Blog
9: Good Governance
The debate between corruption and
economic development is unsettled. Some have argued that corruption damages
economic development because it undermines the economy; however, others have
argued that corruption may be desirable because if provides a quick way to
bypass unnecessary regulations and policies. So taking samples of 163
countries, the data showed a certain correlation between economic development
and corruption level. By taking the GDP PPP per capita (gross domestic product
at purchasing power parity per capita) and the corruption index score of each
country, the data did show a positive relationship between the two sets of
data.
Samuels gave few hypothesis
concerning good governance and economic development. One said that the leaders
had to respond to special-interest pressures for raising taxes and spending on
unproductive activities. Another said that leaders often are not public-minded
so they are susceptible to corruption (Samuels 296). From the collected data,
there seems to be a positive correlation between
The corruption index score came
from Transparency International which monitors corporate and political level of
corruptions and puts out a score for each country. The corruption index score
goes from zero (high corruption) to ten (very clean) ("Transparency
International). The economic development of each country was designated by each
country's GDP PPP per capita. The data came from the information provided by
the World Bank ("World Development Indicator").
(Data graph would not post)
After taking the data, the linear
correlation which measures the strength and the direction of a linear
relationship between two variables was calculated. The result was that r, the
linear correlation coefficient, equaled to be 0.775. As r gets closer to 1, it
shows a strong positive correlation between the two data ("Statistic
2"). From this result, it would be safe to assume that corruption and
economic development have some relationship.
In addition, the R2 is
the coefficient of determination. R2 shows the strength of the
linear association between two variables. It also measures how well the
regression line represents the data, and the further the line is away from the
points, the less the regression line is able to explain about the point
("Statistic 2"). Since the R2 equaled 0.6006, the
regression line is accountable to only 60% of the data points. Though it may
not be the high percent, it still is high enough to assume that the linear
regression line is reliable for these data points.
Even with amongst these data
points, there are outliers that can skew the data and it's linear correlation
shape. Because of the outliers, there is a distortion in the tightness of the
graph. According to this correlation, countries with no corruption should have
better economies; however, this isn't always so. For example, St. Lucia has a
GDP PPP per capita of around $9385 and has a corruption index score of 7. Most
countries with a similar GDP PPP per capita as St. Lucia have corruption index
scores around 2 and 3. Furthermore, countries like Venezuela and Equatorial
Guinea have fairly high GDP PPP per capita but have one of the lowest scores on
the corruption index. So though most countries tend to follow a common trend,
there are few countries that don't always follow it.
In conclusion, from the data
collected, there seems to be a positive correlation between corruption and
economic development. The correlation may not be the strongest; however, there
still a moderate correlation to assume there is a certain relationship. Though
there are few outliers, most of the countries seem to follow the trend that
higher corruption equals less economic development in the country.
Works Cited
Samuels,
David J. 2012. Comparative Politics. New Jersey: Pearson Education
"Statistics
2 - Correlation Coefficient and Coefficient of Determination." Statistics 2 - Correlation
Coefficient and Coefficient of Determination. Finding Your Way Around, n.d.
Web. 18 Nov. 2012.
<http://mathbits.com/MathBits/TIsection/Statistics2/correlation.htm>.
"Transparency International - the Global Coalition
against Corruption." Transparency International - the Global
Coalition against Corruption. Transparency International, 2012. Web. 18
Nov. 2012. <http://www.transparency.org/>.
"World Development Indicators." The
World Bank. The World Bank, 2012. Web. 18 Nov. 2012.
<http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators>.
This was a very clear memo. I was very impressed by the clarity of your conclusions. I would have liked to see more discussion about the indicators that you chose and why you chose them. I feel like the indicators didn't get a lot of airtime.
ReplyDeleteI also appreciated the clarity and how well-written it was
ReplyDeleteI really liked how you drew countries from your graph and compared their corruption and economic development scores for an example.
ReplyDelete