Meghan
Maddock
Blog
7: Duverger’s Law
The electoral system of the
Philippines’ House of Representatives is a hybrid structure, meaning that its
formula is neither completely single member district plurality (hereafter
referred to as SMDP), nor is it completely proportional representation
(hereafter referred to as PR). Rather, 228 of the House of Representatives’ 280
seats are filled by SMDP “first-past-the-post” electoral rules, meaning that
the country is divided into districts, in each of which one seat is won by the
candidate with the plurality of votes, while the remaining 52 seats are filled
according to PR rules (“PHILIPPINES”). The election for the SMDP seats of the
House is held with an open and preferential list structure, meaning that voters
vote for their preferred candidate. The formula of the Philippines’ House of
Representatives is known as “parallel
voting”, meaning that there are, in effect, two separate elections for one
chamber and neither election impacts the other (“Parallel Voting”). There are
no thresholds for the SMDP seats.
The 52 remaining seats are filled using
PR by party nominees from minority parties. They are elected through a closed nonpreferential
list, meaning that voters vote for their preferred party, not for a specific
candidate (“Sectoral Representation”). A single minority party cannot be given
more than three seats and there is a threshold of two percent, meaning that a
party must have at least two percent of the vote before it can receive a seat.
(“PHILIPPINES”). There are 228
legislative districts for a 280 seat House of Representatives, giving the
Philippines’ House of Representatives an average district magnitude of 1.2. The
portion elected by SMDP has a district magnitude of one, while the portion
elected by PR has a district magnitude of 0.2 (“House of Representatives”).
The effective number of political parties
is calculated by taking the inverse of the sum of the squared proportions that
each party has in the legislature (Hawkins). As of 2010, the Lakas-Kampi Party
is in control of 36.93 percent of the Philippines House of Representatives,
while the Liberal Party has 15.38 percent, the Nacionalista Party has 9.08
percent, the PMP Party has 1.40 percent, and the NPC Party has 10.14 percent
(“Politics of the Philippines”). The sum of the squared values of those
proportions is 0.1785, the inverse of which is 5.6. In the Philippines, the
effective number of political parties is 5.6.
The House of Representatives of the
Philippines seems to support Duverger’s Law, which states that SMDP electoral
systems will tend to foster a system of only two parties, while PR electoral
systems are likely to have more than two parties (Hawkins). The Philippines’
House of Representatives employs a hybrid system, so it does not fall neatly
into either of Duverger’s groups. However, the number of effective political
parties being 5.6 indicates that the ability of smaller parties to gain seats
through the allotted PR spots has encouraged the growth of multiple parties.
Though only twenty percent of the seats are under the PR system, their presence
has helped create a multiparty system. Overall, the complicated case of the
Philippines’ House of Representatives supports Duverger’s Law.
Works Cited
Hawkins, Kirk. "Political
Parties." PL SC 150. Joseph F Smith Building, Provo. 29 Oct. 2012.
Lecture.
"House
of Representatives of the Philippines." Wikipedia. Wikimedia
Foundation, 24 Oct. 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2012.
"Parallel
Voting." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 19 Oct. 2012. Web. 02
Nov. 2012.
"PHILIPPINES
Kapulungan Ng Mga Kinatawan (House of Representatives): Electoral System."
IPU PARLINE Database. Inter-Parliamentary Union, 24 Jan. 2012. Web. 30
Oct. 2012.
"Politics
of the Philippines." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 22 Oct. 2012.
Web. 30 Oct. 2012.
"Sectoral
Representation in the House of Representatives of the Philippines." Wikipedia.
Wikimedia Foundation, 26 Oct. 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2012.
The paper is pretty technical, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Nice work and good facts.
ReplyDeleteVery clear. That's awesome that so many parties have the opportunity to be effective.
ReplyDeleteVery straight forward and clear and I like that you cited Doc Hawkins :)
ReplyDelete