Brian Perez
Blog 7
The
electoral system in Chile, consisting of its district magnitude, formula,
thresholds, and party-list system, is unique among the countries of the world.
Chile is divided into 60 constituencies, each with two congressional seats for
each of the two houses of legislature, the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate ("Inter-Parliamentary
Union"). Therefore, the district magnitude for each constituency is two.
The formula for how seats are allocated is based on a majority. If the majority
party wins over two thirds of the votes in a district, it is entitled to both
seats. If it wins less than two thirds, it is still entitled to one and the
second place party takes the other seat. Chile is the only country in the world
to practice this kind of binomial system. A closed non-preferential party-list
majority system is in place, meaning a list of candidates for each party is
decided on only by the leaders of the party. Low-level party members have no
say in the decision. There is a 5% threshold requirement for parties to
continue to exist, leading to the integration or collapse of many of the small
parties in the country (Navia, and Sandoval).
Through
use of a formula, it can be derived that 2 is the best number of political
parties in Chile, with perhaps an additional third party. One formula for
determining the effective number of parties is N=1/Σ(), or the number of
effective parties is equal to the inverse of the sum of the proportions of
votes each party received squared (Navia, and Sandoval).
Party
|
Number of Votes
|
Seats
|
Percentage of
Votes
|
Proportion
|
Proportion
squared
|
Concertación and
Juntos Podemos for More Democracy
|
2,934,378
|
57
|
44.35%
|
.44
|
.19
|
Coalition for
Change
|
2,874,674
|
58
|
43.45%
|
.43
|
.18
|
New Majority for
Chile
|
302,627
|
0
|
4.57%
|
.05
|
.003
|
Clean Chile Vote
Happy
|
356,798
|
3
|
5.39%
|
.05
|
.003
|
Independents
|
147,379
|
2
|
2.23%
|
.02
|
.0004
|
Total
|
6,615,856
|
120
|
100%
|
|
.3764
|
In the table, which describes the outcome of the 2009
congressional election, the five coalitions in Chile are listed with the
numbers of votes each received ("Wikipedia"). That number is divided
by the total number of votes to find the proportion of votes each party
received. These proportions are squared, then added together to get .3764. The
inverse of this number is 2.7. Although it is impossible to have seven tenths
of a party, the decimal is probably indicating that two parties are not quite
enough to represent the entire population. The two major parties represent 87
percent of votes. This is a sizable majority, but perhaps a third party is
necessary for optimal efficiency.
Duverger’s
Law states that the effective number of parties in a country can be determined
by assessing the electoral system in a country. Chile’s electoral system
verifies this claim. It is assumed that a SMDP system, or single-member
district plurality, results in a two-party system. While Chile has more of a
multi-member district plurality, it is closer to the SMDP system than to a
strict proportionality representation system. In PR, seats in congress are
granted to each party based on the proportion of votes each party receives.
Chile’s unique binomial system results in the two main coalitions taking a huge
majority of congressional seats. All but 5 of the seats in the Chamber were won
by these two major parties. Indeed, the electoral system of a country does
determine the number of effective parties.
Works Cited
"Chile
Chamber of Deputies." Inter-Parliamentary
Union. N.p.. Web. 1 Nov 2012.
"Chilean parliamentary election, 2009."
Wikipedia. N.p.. Web. 1 Nov 2012.
Navia, Patricio, and Jose Sandoval. "Binomial
Electoral Law and Multi-Party System: The Chilean Contradiction." . N.p..
Web. 1 Nov 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment