Duverger’s
Law suggests that states with single-member districts and plurality voting
rules lend themselves to having two party systems. Continuing my case
study of India, I looked at the lower house of India’s Parliament (the Lok
Sabha) and determined that this does not hold true in this case.
The
Indian Constitution states that the Lok Sabha can have up to 552 members.
Up to 530 seats can represent the states, up to twenty can represent union
territories, and the President can nominate up to two members to represent the
Anglo-Indian community.
There are currently 545 members.
Other than the two selected by the President, all members are elected in
single-member districts by a simple majority vote (Inter-Parliamentary Union).
Due to this, there is no party list or vote threshold —at least not for the
lower house; India is a hybrid system because its upper house, the Rajya Sabha
is elected by proportional representation. As its lower house
functions under a SMDP system, the district magnitude is naturally one (there are
543 elected seats and 543 districts, with the last two seats coming from
nominations).
There
are currently thirty-eight different political parties that hold seats in the
Lok Sabha (Lok Sabha).
Using the formula given in glass, Neff = 1/∑(p²), I calculated the proportion
of seats each party holds.
I squared the results, added them together, and divided the number one by this
sum to determine that there are 5.12
effective political parties in India.
This is well above the predicted two effective political parties that Duverger’s
Law predicts in an SMDP system.
I
don’t think that India necessarily disproves Duverger’s Law; rather, it is the
exception to the rule. I think that this is because India, as a democracy with
a population of over one billion people, is incredibly diverse.
It would incredibly difficult to streamline everyone’s beliefs into two
distinct political parties.
For this reason, India has developed strong, regional parties that can cater to
many different beliefs.
With over 500 constituencies, it’s natural that many parties would find support
concentrated in a few districts (which explains why there are so many different
political parties popularly elected).
However, only some parties are going to have a
large, national followings. Because it’s so difficult to achieve a majority,
parties must combine to form coalition governments.
REFERENCES
Inter-Parliamentary
Union. India: Lok
Sabha (House of the People).
http://www.ipu.org/parline- e/reports/2145_A.htm
(accessed November 1, 2012).
Lok
Sahba. Fifteenth Lok
Sahba. http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/Members/partywiselist.aspx (accessed November 1, 2012).
Great detailed description of Indian political system!
ReplyDeleteWell done. Clear and Concise. I wonder why India doesn't revert to a PR system with it's vast diversity. With a district magnitude of 1, how can they adequately represent all the different races, ethnicities,cultures, etc. It would just seem like madness. Even with regional parties, not all of them are represented by the districts I am sure. Interesting...
ReplyDeleteI loved your use of facts and statistics. I also agree with you conclusion that fitting everyone into two parties would not be possible. Great job overall!
ReplyDeleteVery nice blog post. It is interesting that India can have so many effective political parties in a SMDP system
ReplyDeleteI like how towards the end you pointed out why it doesn't disprove Duverger's Law, but it is an exception. That makes a lot of sense, and shows you really know something about India.
ReplyDelete