There are many different types of political violence that can occur in
the world, and history is full of such examples. There are revolutions, civil wars, genocides,
and terrorism to name a few. While there
are many examples, I will focus my investigation of the Guatemalan Civil War
that started in 1960 and continued until the rebels declared a ceasefire in 19961.
Many sources call this political conflict a civil war, but after studying
it a little more in depth, it’s not so cut and dry in terms of being a civil war. Comparative Politics defines civil war as “armed
combat within the boundaries of a sovereign state between parties that are
subject to common authority at the start of hostilities2.” While this is true of the Guatemalan Civil
War; that it started under common authority within the boundaries of the state,
there is much more to its history that could possibly change its categorization
with cases of political violence.
Since the time the Spaniards came to America, Guatemala has always had a
problem with discrimination against the indigenous Mayan people. In 1944, “October Revolutionaries” took
control of the government and started instituting liberal policy reform. Leftism seemed to be growing very quickly, so
in consequence, the US government ordered the CIA helped to help organize a
coup d’état to remove the current regime in order to head off a possible “communist
revolt” in 19543. They
installed a right wing military General and for the next decade things went
downhill. Widespread racism against indigenous
Mayans helped aggravate the general Mayan population and set the stage for
insurgent groups to arise and start a civil war4.
Over the next 36 years, war would ravage the country and human rights
would be violated. According to
statistics, over 200,000 Guatemalans would be killed or forcibly disappeared. 83% of those 200,000 were indigenous Mayan
citizens. Why were so many citizens
killed you might ask? Initially some of
the Mayan people sympathized with leftist insurgent groups out of a hope that
their discriminated position could be addressed. The Guatemalan Government took this
connection and used it to spread the idea that all Mayans were connected to
insurgent groups and therefore enemies of the state. Government forces targeted large Mayan
populations in an effort to “starve” insurgent groups of their support5.
At this point, one might ask, was this really just a civil war, or
something more? According to Samuels,
genocide is “a coordinated plan seeking to eliminate all members of particular
ethnic, religious, or national groups, through mass murder6.” Mayans were identified as leftists, insurgent
suppliers and enemies of the state, and then they were systematically murdered
over the next 36 years. According to the
definition in the book, the Guatemalan Civil War qualifies more as genocide. Many people refer to it as a civil war
because it did start under common authority.
Leftist insurgent groups weren't happy with the change of power in
Government and after much discrimination rose up. Some would argue that because some Mayans
sympathized with rebels, they would be counted as part of the insurgency, and
this situation would still be a civil war.
I believe that the key distinguishing point is that the government generalized
and identified all the Mayans as enemies.
They did not distinguish between those that were actually part of the
insurgency and those that just lived in the general area. All Mayans were targeted and executed. It is clear that this was no civil war, but
genocide by the Guatemalan military against its own citizens.
Works Cited
1. 1. Uppsala Universitet
Department of Peace and Conflict Research, "UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict
Dataset." Last modified 2012. Accessed November 9, 2012. http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/datasets/ucdp_prio_armed_conflict_dataset/.
2. 2. David J.
Samuels, Comparative Politics, (Pearson, 2012), 259.
3. 3. Stone, Alex (2009-06-02). "Mountain of evidence - Book
Review | Washington Monthly | Find Articles at BNET". Findarticles.com. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
4. 4. "Online
NewsHour: Peace in Guatemala - December 30, 1996". Pbs.org.
1996-12-30. Retrieved 2009-09-03.
5. 5. The
Center for Justice & Accountability, "Guatemala "Silent
Holocaust" The Mayan Genocide." Last modified 2011. Accessed November
9, 2012. http://www.cja.org/article.php?list=type&type=294.
6. 6. David J.
Samuels, Comparative Politics, (Pearson, 2012), 279.
Nice paper. Good definition of civil war vs. genocide.
ReplyDeleteI really like how you contrasted the two types and showed how the definitions can vary.
ReplyDelete