Blog
7
According to Duverger’s law, it states that the effective
number of parties in any electoral district is a function of electoral rules;
and more specifically proportional representation allows for more than two
effective parties while a single member party district only allows for two
parties. Therefore in the case of Brazil, this law holds true to the functions
of elections. In
Brazil’s latest election in 2010, as stated in the Inter-Parliamentary Union,
there were all 513 seats of the Chamber of Deputies at stake and no one party
reserved a majority¹. As follows, using the formula for effective number of
parties, the effective number of parties derived was 9.90. This upholds
Duverger’s law in that in a proportional system of representation, there is a
greater number of effective parties. In Brazil a Presidential system is
practiced with proportional representation in the Deputies of Chambers.
According to the Kellogg Institute, the electoral process follows that in the
Chamber of Deputies, the district magnitudes range from 8 to 60 deputies based
on population, which allows for a disproportional representation of states in a
PR system. The state that holds the highest number of seats is Sao Paolo with
the highest population, and as follows, to gain a seat in the district, the
minimum threshold is quite low. The Institute states that the minimum threshold
in any district is the electoral quotient- the number of votes divided by
number of seats. Therefore in Sao Paolo for example, the party would have to
ear 1/60 of the votes². In addition to the threshold and magnitude, Brazil
practices a preferential system of casting votes by way of list structure; as
well as the largest remainders method of allocating seats in which the highest
averages get the seats ². However, even with Brazil’s coherence to the rule of
Duverger’s law, which allows for a multiple party representation, there is
still an unequal representation because of the low minimal threshold and
largest remainders method, there is still a disproportional representation in
the system of distributing seats among the states; which means that areas with
poverty and lower population are grossly underrepresented.
Works
Cited
1.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. “Brazil:
Chamber of Deputies,.” Accessed November 2, 2012. online. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2043_B.htm.
2.
Mainwaring, Scott. Kellogg Institute. “POLITICIANS,
PARTIES AND ELECTORAL SYSTEMS: BRAZIL IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE.” Accessed November
2, 2012. Online. http://kellogg.nd.edu/publications/workingpapers/WPS/141.pdf
Nice work!
ReplyDelete