Thursday, November 1, 2012

Blog 7: Russia


Stephen H. Lamb

Blog 7: Russia and Devurger’s Law

Devurger’s law states that the type of electoral institution determines the number of “effective” political parties. Devurger uses “effective” in the sense of the strength of prominence of the political party. He believed that a single member democratic plurality institution tends to create two effective parties while a proportional representation institution will create more than two parties (Samuels 2013). At first sight this law seems plausible, but can it be proven by comparing the electoral institution and the number of effective parties in a country like Russia?

In order to find whether Devurger’s law is true in the case of Russia we will consider Russia’s lower legislative body the, “State Duma.” We will look at the electoral institution and the effective number of parties through the number of effective parties formula.

Electoral Institution

The State Duma utilizes an electoral institution of proportional representation with 450 representatives. The district magnitude is two seats per district. The candidates are selected in their respective parties on the basis of a party list (Russia Electoral System 2012). This party list is closed/non-preferential meaning that it is determined by an interior ranking system (Rule and Shvedova 2012).

The threshold to enter parliamentary representation is seven percent of the votes. In January this threshold will change to five percent. Currently, parties that receive between five and six percent of the votes may have one seat and those that receive between six and seven percent may have two seats but neither of these groups are allowed to join parliamentary factions. This system of proportional representation, according to Devurger’s law, should tend to create more than two effective parties (Russia Electoral System 2012).

Number of Effective Parties

In order to find out if this is true, the number of effective parties formula will be used. This formula takes one and divides it by the sum of the proportion of seats won squared to determine how may parties are truly effective (Samuels 2013).

Russia’s State Duma is composed of four main parties: United Russia, Communist Party, A Just Russia, and Liberal Democratic Party of Russia. The results of the last election in 2011 are shown in the chart below (Russia Last Elections 2012).

Political Group
Votes
Seats Won

Proportion

United Russia
32,379,135
238

238/450=.528

Communist Party (KPRF)
12,599,507
92

92/450= .204

A Just Russia
8,695,522
64

64/450= .142

Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR)
7,664,570
56

56/450= .124

(Russia Last Elections 2012)

Below is the formula for the number of effective parties and the result for the State Duma.  

Effective Number of Parties
Formula

2.8035
1/(.528^2+.204^2+.142^2+.124^2)


According to the result of 2.8035 effective parties, Devurger’s law is proven correct in this case. Although the score is not extremely significant, it does fit within the general law. Russia’s State Duma has proportional representation and has more than two effective political parties.






Works Cited

Rule, Wilma, and Nadezhda Shvedova. "Russia: An Evolving Parallel System." Idea. 2012. http://www.idea.int/esd/upload/russia.pdf (accessed October 31, 2012).
Russia Electoral System. 2012. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2263_B.htm (accessed October 31, 2012).
Russia Last Elections. 2012. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2263_E.htm (accessed October 31, 2012).
Samuels, David J. Comparative Politics. New York: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013.



1 comment:

  1. Very interesting. It comes really close to disproving Duverger's Law, but I imagine that's because Russia tends to squash opposition parties. I would be interested to find out what happens in January when the threshold changes. I imagine the effective number of parties will go up.

    ReplyDelete