Erika Ralph
11-9-2012
Blog 8: Greek Civil War
Categorizing Political
Violence
According
to David Samuels, for a Civil war to actually be a Civil War, the country
involved must have experienced “armed combat within the boundaries of a
sovereign state between parties that are subject to common authority at the
start of hostilities.”[1] Coinciding with his definition, David Samuels
also states that a Civil War is normally preceded by or characterized by state
weakness, colonial legacies, poverty, and “the attitudes and actions of foreign
countries.”[2]
Understanding these definitions and the
historical and political context of the Greek Civil War, we see that David
Samuels’s definition does hold true in this particular case.
The Greek Civil War could be considered
a continuation of the grievances born during and after the Second World War.[3] During
WWII, following Greece’s defeat in 1941, “joint German-Italian-Bulgarian” forces
began occupying Greece.[4]
As this occupation overruled and
destroyed political organizations in Greece, the Greek Communist Party (KKE)
began to emerge as a resistance, with an army of 60,000 fighters known as the
Greek National Liberation Army (ELAS).[5] Eventually with this resistance on the rise, the
Nazi party withdrew from Greece in November of 1944. However, this only led to British forces
seizing the opportunity to regain control in Athens, finding a chance to
restore and support the original government in a now crumbling Greece.
These “attitudes and actions of
foreign countries” in Greece left Grecian citizens divided and destroyed. And although, these events cannot necessarily
be classified as “colonial” legacy (that David Samuels asserts as one of the
reasons for Civil War) these historical occurrences still share some of the detriments
that do countries gaining independence from colonial rule. As Nazi forces, and then British forces
occupied Grecian territory, Greek governmental organizations began to dissolve
and lose serious legitimacy, which is strikingly similar to the experience of
newly independent colonial governments.
Greek governments lost strength and, upon regaining control in December
of 1944 from British forces, the Greek Communist Party (KKE) was unable to, as
David Samuels puts it, gain “effectiveness that enhances legitimate rule, such
as provision of public services for all citizens and an ability to foster
economic development.”[6]
Along with a Greek government that
couldn’t seem to restore legitimacy, and a Communist Party also struggling to
gain legitimacy, Greece was suffering from great economic distress and poverty-
another reason for Civil War according to David Samuels. To add to a weak state, the German forces
that had drawn Allied attacks On Greece, then retreated in 1944 and left Greece
to burn:
“At the end of World War II, Greece
stood in virtual ruin. During the German occupation, which lasted until October
1944, the economy nearly collapsed. Allied bombing raids destroyed miles of
railroads and devastated the major port cities of Salonika, Volos, and Piraeus.
A combination of heavy military traffic and neglect left the country's highway
network in a precarious condition. Then, as the Germans withdrew, they blew up
bridges, highways, and portions of the 4-mile-long Corinth Canal, which was a
vital link between Athens and the Adriatic Sea.”[7]
This economic disaster led to David Samuel’s idea of
poverty’s influence on Civil War: “…where poverty is endemic, rebel leaders can
build an army on the cheap, because more able-bodied men need a job. In a poor and weak state, government may lack
the resources to dissuade men from joining the insurgents.”[8]
Eventually,
British support of the original Greek government pushed back at the Greek
Communist Party, which had at one point, received support from Russian organizations.
A truce was signed between the
Communist party army (ELAS) and the Greek/British government on February 12,
1945, aiming to gain some reconciliation between both these right wing and left
wing organizations. However, the truce
did not last long after both parties broke contract:
“The breach of its terms by both
sides led to a new political polarization and the dramatic events of the last
stage of a harsh civil war that lasted until 1949. The mass movement of the
left now came under pressure and persecution and thus, in 1946 the tragedy
began of a war that cost thousands of lives, with Greek fighting Greek in the
mountains and in the cities.”[9]
After a series of bloody encounters, United States forces
joining the fray and 158,0000 citizens killed on Greek soil, the last
significant leader of the Greek Communist party was capture on August 28, 1949.[10] And only months later, the forces of the
Greek Communist party announced their surrender (October 16). As a result, “rather than stay in Greece,
those of the fighters who survived and tens of thousands of other leftists
chose exile in camps in neighboring communist countries and in the Soviet Union.”[11]
[1]
Samuels, D. J. (2013). Comparative politics.
(2 ed., Vol. 1). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
[2] Samuels, D. J. (2013). Comparative politics.
(2 ed., Vol. 1). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
[3] Pike, J. (2011, November 07). Greek civil war.
Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/greek.htm
[4] Kalyvas, S. N. (1993). The greek civil war in
retrospect. Yale University Press. Retrieved from http://stathis.research.yale.edu/documents/kalyvasCORR.spr99.pdf
[5] Pike, J. (2011, November 07). Greek civil war.
Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/greek.htm
[7] Pike, J. (2011, November 07). Greek civil war.
Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/greek.htm
[8] Samuels, D. J. (2013). Comparative politics.
(2 ed., Vol. 1). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
[9] Pike, J. (2011, November 07). Greek civil war.
Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/greek.htm
[10] Pike, J. (2011, November 07). Greek civil war.
Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/greek.htm
[11] Pike, J. (2011, November 07). Greek civil war.
Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/greek.htm
This was a well-researched blog post. I was impressed by your knowledge of the situation in Greece and thought it was a good analysis.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting choice for the blog. It is very clear that this fits the definition of civil war given by Samuels. I think that the leftists in the conflict might also have been considered somewhat of a revolutionary movement and also used many guerrilla war tactics. This is one of the greatest shortcoming in the definitions provided by Samuels, they are all so closely interrelated.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great job at exploiting some of the weaknesses of Samuels definitions. Well researched and well presented...
ReplyDelete