Mark Mackey
Pl Sc 150
Blog 7: Duverger’s
Law
Different
countries around the world have very different party systems. The United States
of America, for instance, has only two major parties that consistently win
elections. Other countries have a much larger number of competitive political
parties, such as Serbia. The relationship between party systems and electoral
systems is theorized in Duverger’s law. This law claims that
single-member-district plurality (SMDP) electoral systems “encourage the emergence
of two large parties,” while proportional representation (PR) systems encourage
“a variety of smaller parties” (Shively, 233). The case of Serbia’s National
Assembly seems to validate Duverger’s law.
Effective Parties
The National Assembly is the unicameral
legislative branch of Serbia, and the most recent election held for the body
was on May 6, 2012 (“Serbia”). In this election a total of eleven parties won
seats in the parliament, with the largest numbers awarded to the Let’s Get
Serbia Moving party, the Choice for a Better Life party, and the Ivica Dacic
coalition. However, not every party that won a seat can be counted as
effective. The equation Neff = 1/Σp2 can be used to find the number of effective
parties in any party system. Using this equation and the data in the table
below, the number of effective parties in Serbia is 4.9.
Party
|
Seats
|
Proportion
|
|
Let’s
Get Serbia Moving
|
73
|
.292
|
.085
|
Choice
for a Better Life
|
67
|
.268
|
.072
|
Ivica
Dacic
|
44
|
.176
|
.031
|
Democratic
Party of Serbia
|
21
|
.084
|
.007
|
Turnover
|
19
|
.076
|
.006
|
United
Regions of Serbia
|
16
|
.064
|
.004
|
Five
other parties
|
10
|
.04
|
-
|
Total
|
250
|
1.0
|
.205
|
(data from Wikipedia, “Elections in Serbia”)
This number is clearly illustrated in the election results.
Three parties received the majority of the votes, as stated above, yet several
other parties were awarded a relatively large amount of representation in the
Assembly (accounting for the additional 1.9 effective parties). Since Serbia’s
electoral system is a PR system (“Serbia”), these results strongly support
Duverger’s law.
Electoral Rules
As mentioned above, the National
Assembly of Serbia is a unicameral parliamentary body. There are 250 directly
elected representatives in the Assembly, and elections are held every four
years. A single nationwide constituency elects all 250 members, making the
district magnitude 250/1, or 250. Seats are allocated proportionally using the
d’Hondt method. Serbia’s electoral system consists purely of proportional
representation – there is no hybrid use of SMDP (SMDP would not work anyway in
Serbia’s electoral system since there is only one district – the entire
country). The list structure the country uses in voting is somewhat open:
candidates can be submitted by political organizations and coalitions as well
as by citizen groups, which have to be supported by at least 10,000 voters.
Parties must pass the threshold of five percent of the total vote in order to
win a seat in the assembly, but parties “representing coalitions of ethnic
minorities” do not have to reach any threshold to win seats (“Serbia”). Five
such coalitions won seats in the National Assembly in the 2012 election (“Elections”).
Sources
“Elections
in Serbia.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Serbia
(accessed November 1, 2012).
“Serbia:
Narodna skupstina (National Assembly).” Inter-Parliamentary Union. http://ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2355_B.htm
(accessed November 1, 2012).
Shively,
W. Phillips. Power & Choice: An
Introduction to Political Science. New York City: McGraw-Hill, 2012.
(accessed November 1, 2012).
That is a cool provision that ethnic minority groups don't have to reach a threshold, though it doesnt seem very democratic to give special rules to different people just because they are different. Reverse-discrimination?
ReplyDeleteYOu had great organization and it was really easy to follow your points! good job.
ReplyDelete