Blog 5
Political
identity, as described by J.J. Samuelson, are the ways that individuals
categorize themselves and others, and how they understand the power
relationships of domination and oppression that exist between the groups.
According to this definition, there
is a definite trend in political identity that could be viewed as a “Mormon
political identity” because of overwhelming statistics both in and outside of
Utah and voting trends on party specific issues such as abortion and
gay-marriage, which support that the majority of Mormons prefer the Republican
Party. However, these may change in the future, as more Mormons become members
of the Democratic Party.
First,
Mormon political identity, favoring the Republican Party is evident in a
nationwide survey reported in the Salt Lake Tribune from December of 2011. According to researchers from Trinity College
in Connecticut, cited in article from 2008, 59 percent of Mormons declared
themselves as Republicans while 14 percent declared themselves as Democrats
(Gehrke). This overwhelming trend becomes even more evident within the largely
Mormon state of Utah. According to the same survey, two-thirds of Utah citizens
report themselves as Republican while only seven percent report themselves as
Democrats (Gehrke). The chart at right from the Salt Lake Tribune portrays
these above statistics.
This trend and therefore a
political identity seems obvious though because of the LDS Church’s negative
stance toward political issues like gay marriage and abortion. In the recent
past, the LDS church has taken an aggressive stance against the passing of
Proposition 8, in favor of gay-marriage in California, and abortion, which are
two parts of the Republican platform. It therefore seems natural that the
majority of Mormons would side with a party that supports those important
political issues.
This brings up the important issue
of whether Mormons are born into this identity according Huntinton’s
primordialist argument, or whether there is the potential for change according
to J.J. Samuelson’s constructivist argument. In this situation, Huntington argument
would assert that the Mormon culture is primordialist because the identities
that can become political are those formed very early in life (Hawkins). This
theory would be true, except for the 14 percent in the above nationwide study
and seven percent in the Utah study. In the case of the minority of democrats,
Samuelson’s case seems to be true because the larger variation of
Mormon-Democrats outside of Utah suggests that identities are malleable
(Hawkins). If there are larger percentages of Mormon-Democrats outside of Utah,
then the Mormon political identity must be semi-malleable and therefore
constructivist.
Overall, it would seem that there
is at least a semi-constructivist Mormon-Republican political identity within
Utah, as demonstrated by statistics both in and outside of Utah and voting
trends on party specific issues such as abortion and gay-marriage, which
support that the majority of Mormons prefer the Republican Party.
Works Cited
Hawkins, Kirk Andrew.
Comparative Politics Course Lecture, PL SC 150.
10 October 2012. See also
Samuels, David. Comparative Politics. Pearson Education, Inc., 2013.
149. Print.
Robert, Gehrke.
"Survey: Mormons embrace GOP, shun Democrats." Salt Lake Tribune. 14
Dec 2011. Web. 11 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home2/53110048-183/mormons-utah-lds-party.html.csp>.
I agree with you about the formation of LDS political identity. I think though that both the primordialist and constructivist argument explain the formation of political identity and particularly in the LDS church, primordialist usually explains those who are LDS Republicans and constructivist usually (but not always) explains those who are LDS democrats.
ReplyDelete