Blog 5: Political Identity
Jeff Merrell
Jeff Merrell
Call me crazy, but I believe that the political identity
within the U.S. LDS culture is in the early stages of a political flip-flop
(flip-flop being something with which Mormons across the United States should
be familiar, especially right now). The
traditional political identity within LDS culture, which exists, is one I
describe as Primordialist Republican, whereas the new-wave political identity
is a Constructivist Moderate approach.
Below is a brief explanation of some key terms and concepts, followed by
descriptions of these two LDS political identities.
Foundational Terminology
Mormons. The term “Mormon” can be used to refer to
members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, regardless of their
location. For the purposes of this blog,
however, “Mormon” will refer to members of the LDS Church who are Americans
and/or living in the United States.
Identity. The ways that individuals categorize
themselves, with a resulting feeling of close emotional association.[1]
Primordialism. Identities that can become political are
those formed very early in life or perhaps vaguely racial/genetic.[3]
Primordialist
Republicans
“I am voting for a Republican because I’m a Mormon.” That, or any similar statement, is common
within LDS culture (especially in Utah).
In my lifetime, I was always told that we vote for Republicans because
that’s what we do and what we have always done.
I believe that Mormons adopted this philosophy of only voting Republican
because of some polarizing issues about which the Democratic Party held some
positions in direct contradiction to LDS doctrine (e.g., homosexual marriage, women’s
reproductive rights, etc.). Since 1990,
the percentage of Utah Mormons who support Republican candidates has increased,
and a lot of that increase is as a result of these polarizing issues.[5]
While the early adoption of a “Mormons only vote for
Republicans” may have been founded on legitimate concerns with real political
and moral issues, I do not necessarily feel that the continuation of this
mindset is solely based on those concerns.
My generation of Mormons is full of “Primordialist Republicans” – those
whose political identities were formed early in life and based more on
tradition than substantive political analysis.
Constructivist
Moderates
While most of my generation may still fall within the
Primordialist Republican category, it seems as if a shift is taking place. I would not go as far as to say that Mormons
are transitioning from tradition-based Republicans to freshly-converted
Democrats, but it is very apparent that Mormons are becoming more so like
“Constructivist Moderates.” Mormons,
especially those ages 16-30, seem to be more open to an evolving political
identity derived from a sincere analysis of both sides (Republican and Democratic). It is this willingness to redefine political
opinions that has led to a constructivist approach, and it is the willingness
to hold beliefs on both sides of the aisle that has led to a growing population
of Mormon moderates.
Let’s look at two popular Mormon US politicians for insight
as to how this shift may have started.
Based on their political track records, Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman
have not been the most staunchly Republican governors. Both politicians most recently shifted to the
right politically as they sought the Republican nomination for the US
Presidency, but their achievements as governors clearly illustrate moderate
views. Some may say that Romney was
moderate because of the dynamics of Massachusetts, but Huntsman does not have
that luxury.[6] Many of Huntsman’s political positions are
not right-winged and his extremely high popularity contradicts the thought that
Utah Mormons are strictly Republican.
Recent data demonstrates that Mormons are becoming more and
more open to left-wing political positions.
Survey data of Utah Mormon voters shows that the percentage of those
completely opposed to gay marriage has decreased from 69% in 2004 to 38% in
2012.[7] That entire 30% gap shifted to being more
open to civil unions for gay couples.
Not only does this data demonstrate that the Mormon political identity
is malleable and, thus, constructivist, but it also shows that Mormon voters
are adopting more moderate positions on what were previously highly polarizing
issues.
Conclusion
Yes, there is definitely a political identity among US
Mormons. Few Mormons would state that
their religious identity does not affect their voting behavior. The trend that is being seen, however, is one
of a tradition-based Primordialist Republican identity slowly transitioning to a
Constructivist Moderate political identity (as described above).
[1]
Course Lecture, PL SC 150. 10 October
2012.
[2]
Course Lecture, PL SC 150. 10 October
2012. See also Samuels, David. Comparative
Politics. Pearson Education, Inc., 2013. 149. Print.
[3]
Course Lecture, PL SC 150. 10 October
2012.
[4]
Course Lecture, PL SC 150. 10 October
2012.
[5] Cherkis,
Jason. "Huntsman Was For Health Care Mandate Before He Was Against
It." Huffington Post. 20 May 2011. Web. 10 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/20/huntsman-was-for-health-care-mandate_n_864838.html>.
[6] Patterson,
Kelly. "Public Opinion on Gay Marriage in Utah." Utah Data Points, 09
Jul 2012. Web. 10 Oct 2012. <http://utahdatapoints.com/>.
[7] Robert,
Gehrke. "Survey: Mormons embrace GOP, shun Democrats." Salt Lake
Tribune [Salt Lake City] 14 Dec 2011. Web. 10 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home2/53110048-183/mormons-utah-lds-party.html.csp>. See also Utah Colleges Exit Poll and Utah
Voter Poll.
great post. found the change in how mormons view gay marriage interesting.
ReplyDeleteThe shift in LDS member's opinions was really interesting, it was interesting to see how much young LDS member's opinions were formed by their culture.
ReplyDeleteThe majority of us usually act along the same political lines as our parents. This, however, seems even more prevalent here in Utah. Great insight and well written!
ReplyDeleteGreat post! It is interesting that the Mormon political identity is changing with the younger generations of LDS members. The culture of today is definitely different from that of our parents or grandparents.
ReplyDeleteYou had a great post. I like how you structured your argument to shift between the Primordialist theory to the constructivist theory to explain your point.
ReplyDelete