Political Identity
Utah is a state that has a
unique political character. The reason for the state’s uniqueness is the high
percentage of the population that are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints. In this blog post, I argue that members of the LDS church do
in fact have a distinct political identity here in the United States. To
support my argument, I will provide brief statistical data that shows a clear
preference among LDS Americans concerning the two main political parties, which
also suggests the presence of a distinct political identity among Mormons.
Then, I will use both the primordialist and constructivist arguments to provide
an explanation as to why this distinct political identity has formed.
Mormon = Republican
An
interesting dynamic of the LDS faith is the vast number of its members that
favor the Republican Party. According to the National Survey of Mormons that
was conducted in the fall of 2011 by Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion
and Public Life, 80% of Mormons in Utah belong to the Republican Party. 8% of
Utah Mormons are independent voters and only 12% are Democrats(City Weekly,
2012). One might think that this partisan trend exists only among Utah Mormons;
however, 74% of Mormons living outside of Utah identify themselves with the
Republican Party, 9% are independent voters, and 17% are Democrats. This data
suggest that certain elements of the LDS faith encourage members all over the
United States to identify themselves with the political ideologies that are represented
by the Republican Party as opposed to those represented by the Democratic
Party. The next paragraph uses both the primordialist and constructivist
arguments to explain some likely causes of the presence of this distinct LDS
political identity.
Primordialism and Constructivism
According to the book Comparative Politics, primordialism is
an idea that suggests that a political identity is formed during a person’s infancy
as he or she is subject to the political preferences and ideologies of his or
her community (Samuels 2012). The book also states that this kind of political
identity can become politicized when “individuals view the visible
manifestations of their community’s culture--its language, religion, symbols,
clothes, food, and other practices--as natural, timeless, and worth defending”
(Samuels 2012, 153).The LDS church definitely has a distinct community that has
its own language, symbols, dress code, food (funeral potatoes), and practices.
The majority of the members of the LDS faith feel that principles that are
taught within this community are worth defending such as traditional marriage
between a man and a woman and the preservation of life for unborn children. Therefore,
one reason that so many members of the LDS faith identify themselves with the
Republican Party is because it is the party that most closely promotes the
ideology that exists in their culture.
In addition to the primordialist
argument, the constructivist argument suggests that a political identity can be
acquired, replaced, or changed in time. In
one example, the book points to Christian missionaries as a means of the
politicization of religious identities. The book states that “slow, long-term
change in the social context shapes how individuals conceive of themselves and
their community, which, in turn, influences the politicization of identity as
whole” (Samuels 2012, 159). The LDS church has one of the largest
missionary programs of any church in the world. Young missionaries teach the
principles of their church in hopes that other people will be converted to
them. As people accept these principles
many times they abandon their old way of thinking and align their beliefs with
that of the LDS culture.
Conclusion
As
seen in the paragraphs above, the LDS religion does indeed have a distinct
political identity. The causes of this unique political identity can be seen in
both the primordialist and constructivist arguments. On one hand, political
identity is created within the LDS culture which aligns itself with the
teachings of the church, and on the other hand, missionary efforts help in the
changing of political identities by teaching the principles of their religious
culture.
REFERENCES
1.
City Weekly. Myth
of the Utah Mormon. http://www.cityweekly.net/utah/article-77-15433- myth-of-the-utah-mormon.html
(accessed October 11, 2012).
2.
Samuels, David J. 2012. Comparative Politics. New Jersey: Pearson.
Great explanation and use of the two approaches. the 74% is for republicans in the U.S. not just the ones outside of the untied states.
ReplyDeleteThis was very well written. You did a great job of explaining the two sides, and had a great use of the statistics.
ReplyDeleteInsightful comments and good data- I like that you used it so early in your paper.
ReplyDelete