Mormon Political
Identity? Duh!
In the
midst of this presidential election season, and in the middle of the “Mormon
Moment”, the eyes of the nation have been turned to the LDS church. More
closely examined than perhaps ever before, the Church, and its members, have
become the subject of both praise and ridicule. With the Mitt Romney carrying the
Republican nomination, many wonder how this will affect the Mormon vote in
America. This blog will primarily answer the question “Is there a Mormon
political identity?” Though one may jump to hasty conclusions, it deserves more
careful scrutiny. We will also discuss the constructivist and primordialist
arguments and see which has more bearing on this specific case.
It has long been assumed that all
Mormons are conservative, though this is not the case, it does represent an
overwhelming majority. In a poll conducted by The Pew Forum on Religion and
Public Life, 66% of Mormons consider themselves conservative, whereas only 8% consider
themselves liberal. Likewise, when asked to identify themselves in a party
context, 74% identified themselves as Republican, or leaning Republican and
only 17% did so respecting the Democratic Party. Those who identify themselves
as Democrats find themselves members of a substantial minority. This poll also
shows overwhelming majorities in support for Mitt Romney, smaller government, and
views on moral/social issues; i.e. the morality of homosexuality, extramarital
sex, consumption of alcohol, etc. (Pew, 2012). In short, not saying that devout
members of the LDS church can’t adhere to a liberal ideology, but the clear
majority of Mormons have a conservative ideology; The Mormon political identity
on the whole leans conservative and towards the Republican Party.
Now which of the arguments, constructivist
or primordialist, is represented best by this brief case study? Primordialism
is the idea that “identities are something people are born with or that emerge
through deep psychological processes in early childhood, given one’s family and
community context” (Samuels, 153). On the other hand, the constructivist
argument is that “political identities are malleable, even if they often appear
to be primordial, and suggests that we think of identity as an evolving
political process rather than as a fixed set of identity categories” (Samuels,
153). Religion is a very intimate aspect of life, and it is infused, or not
infused, best within familial ties. Those who are born and raised in a certain
religion tend to adhere to that religion’s creeds, thus following a pattern set
by those who have gone before. Politics seem to progress hand in hand with
religion in this regard. Another interesting finding in this poll was that for
Mormons who don’t live in the West, the number of Republicans goes down while
the number of Democrats goes up (Pew, 2012). One possible theory is that,
because of the moral standards and perspectives espoused by church members
early in the Church’s history, the majority have maintained conservative standards,
passing them down to their posterity. As the church spread out of the West,
more of those that were converted, possibly already Democrats, maintained their
political preference as their children maintain that of their parents. This
could account for the increase, however small, of Democratic Mormons outside of
the West. It is evident that the primordial argument is better represented in
this case.
Is
there a Mormon political identity? Yes, there definitely is. It has clear
tendencies to shift Mormons to a conservative rather than liberal ideology.
This is apparently brought on by a set of values and ideologies passed down by
the parents to their children, not necessarily changing the ideologies of
converts. This is a great example of a primordialist identity.
References
Samuels, David J. Comparative
Politics. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2013.
The Pew Forum on
Religion and Public Life. Mormons in America: Politics, Society and Morality. 2012.
http://www.pewforum.org/Christian/Mormon/mormons-in-america-politics-society-and-morality.aspx
(accessed October 11, 2012).
I mostly agree your argument that it is because of conservative values "espoused by church members early in the Church’s history," that remains the reason why most Mormons lean conservative. However, Democrats actually won in a largely Mormon Utah regularly, and controlled the Utah House of Representatives and Senate all the way into the 1970's. It mostly changed after Roe v Wade. I would blame the Mormon bias more on the politicization of certain issues (such as abortion and same-sex marriage), not a certain Mormon political identity that has remained the same since the founding of the church.
ReplyDelete