Thursday, October 11, 2012

Mormons and Political Identity


Chase Pulley

12 October 2012

Blog 5 Political Identity

            Is there a distinct LDS political identity here in the United States? If so what causes this LDS political identity and what is it? A political identity is, “the ways that individuals categorize themselves and others, and how they understand the power relationships of domination and oppression that exist between groups.” (Samuels David, 149) According to the Gallup Politics, 59% of LDS members identified themselves as conservative, 31% as moderate, and 8% as liberal. (Frank Newport) From that information we can see that there is a distinct political identity to the LDS faith.

            So what helped developed the LDS political identity? One of the reasons that should be brought up is the intense persecution the LDS church faced in the early day of its founding. Another factor to look at is the close knit families in the LDS religion and the focus on taking care of one another. A third and final factor I will bring up is the desire of most members to provide for themselves and not be hindered by the government taking too much power

Even though the LDS church itself does not support one party more than another; many of its members have more conservatism beliefs that liberal. So what causes this more conservative leaning? Is it more primordialism or more constructivism? Primordialists believe that political identities are something that people are born with or something that is taught at a very young age. Whereas people who believe in constructivism believe that a person’s political identity is something that can change and evolves over time rather than one set identity. The best answer that I can see is a mixture of both of them; no one approach fully covers all situations.

 The Primordialist approach could best explain the aspect of LDS children in primary class. As young kids they learn basic beliefs that can be seen as a more conservative leaning; such as the song “I am a Child of God” and the belief that everybody is a child of God. This leads to a more conservative approach when circumstances arise concerning the more liberal views of abortion. The idea that people are born with this political identity is one that I find to be more absurd and would not agree with. Though the idea that as young children they learn and develop a political identity from that I would agree with.

Though constructivism can be seen when a person converts over to the LDS church and gradually shifts their political identity to be more in line with the LDS political identity. It must be addressed that this shift does not always happen when a person joins the LDS faith. Another way that constructivism has been present in the LDS religion is the fact that in the early days of the church most church members were democrat. This can be seen from the following quote, “For most of its early decades, the GOP was staunchly against Mormons” (George E. Condon Jr.) This shows that a shift in a religious group can occur in accordance to the constructivism argument. The people at the time of the shift weren’t stuck having a rigid un-malleable Political identity, it could change.

The LDS religion does have a political identity and a combination of the Primordialism and Constructivism viewpoints are the most encompassing. Though I feel like the Constructivism viewpoint has better points in which it explains the political identity of the LDS church. But some of the points as shown above from the Primordialist viewpoint help us understand the political identity of the LDS church.

 

 
Works Cited
"Mormons Most Conservative Major Religious Group in U.S." Mormons Most Conservative Major Religious Group in U.S. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://www.gallup.com/poll/125021/Mormons-Conservative-Major-Religious-Group.aspx>.
"Republicans Weren't Always So Accepting of Mormons." NationalJournal.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-election/republicans-weren-t-always-so-accepting-of-mormons-20120827>.
Samuels, David. Comparative Politics. New York: Pearson Education, 2013. Print.

2 comments:

  1. Interesting, right? Also, when you consider how many more Mormons are democrats or libertarians today, you get even more of a sense of how much the political identity has changed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the approach that was taken with the political identity being perhaps a cause of early persecution. It helps show that even though the church may not support one political party over another, the members are so close knit that when a LDS presidential candidate runs for the office there is an immediate connection.

    ReplyDelete