Suhwan
(Alma) Seo
Poli
Sci 150
Professor
Hawkins
October
12, 2012
Blog 5
Though it would be difficult to exactly point out what
LDS political identity is, there still are few characteristics about political
identity found among LDS members. One of the causes of the LDS political
identity is the uncompetitive election found in Utah. Many people think of LDS
members as mostly Republicans with strong conservative views; however, it
wasn't always that way, but with the rise of the Republican party, there was a
shift in the LDS political identity that is known today.
According to Morgan Lyon Cotti, a research director at
the Utah Foundation, Republicans have held a strong majority since 1979 in
Utah; however, the majority of LDS members weren't always Republican. Between
1933 and 1950, there was a strong dominance by the Democratic party. And during
the early-1970's when the political races seemed competitive, there were more
people out to vote and express their political identity (Cotti). However, with
the Republicans becoming a strong majority, it has brought about a change in
the LDS political identity. No longer is Utah looked upon as a swing state or a
state with diverse political identity.
Now Utah is considered a Republican state with majority
of the Republican candidates winning either uncontested or by more than 30%
margin (Cotti). Furthermore, Utah is also considered to have one of the lowest
voter turn-out states because as the political races have become more
one-sided, many voters feel that they either don't need to vote because their
candidate is going to win anyways or that their votes don't matter. So LDS
political identity has become strongly Republican with a low incentive to
actually vote.
Though having a low-voting turnout does not mean the
people are lazy or lack the motivation to actually vote, it's just that
people's identities have evolved and they don't feel the need to express their
political view. The constructivist argument about political identity seems more
applicable in this situation. The constructivist argument states that political
identities are malleable and that identity is an evolving political process.
And as a LDS society as a whole, there is a shift from a Democratic majority to
a Republican majority after late-1970's ("History of the Grand Old
Party"). In addition, there is a shift from proactive voter turnout to a
more stagnant voter turn-out; however, it would be wrong to assume that the Republicans
coming into power are the only reason that there is shift in this political
identity among the LDS members.
One of the causes that started this trend of Republicans
gaining more support, then voters becoming more Republican, and then the
decrease in the voter turnout is the change in the political stance of the parties
around the 1930's. The Democrats took upon a more liberal stance with the
initiation of the New Deal. And during World War II and the Cold War, there is a
shift as conservatives began supporting the Republicans because of their
resistance to the New Deal. So with this shift in trend, Utahans, who were
mostly conservative, began switching their political identity which eventually
led to the political identity that most LDS members seem to have today.
In conclusion, the idea that political identities are
something that people are born with doesn't seem to apply in this situation.
According Cotti, there is a change of political identity from a more Democratic
stance to a Republican stance (Cotti). And though there are many factors that
have influenced this change, few of the biggest factors were the change in the
political stance of the Republican Party as well as the Republican Party coming
to gain more support from the people. These factors have pushed the LDS
political identity to become what it is today.
Works Cited
Cotti, Morgan
L. "Do Uncompetitive Elections Hurt Turnout in Utah?" Utah
Data Points. Utah Data Points, 25 June 2012. Web. 10 Oct. 2012.
"History
Of The Grand Old Party." History Of The Republican Party.
N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://www.socastee.com/politics/history_gop.html>.
I definitely agree that Mormon political culture has evolved over time. Well done.
ReplyDelete