While the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints does not “endorse, promote or oppose political parties,
candidates or platforms,” (“Political Neutrality”) there is a distinct LDS
political identity in the United States. Members of the Church in this country
are generally thought to be conservative Republicans, a view supported by the fact
that Mitt Romney, a Latter-day Saint, is running as the Republican presidential
nominee. However, not all Mormons fit into this conservative stereotype. In
recent years, Mormons have become more liberal and Democratic, showing that the
current LDS political identity may not be totally accurate.
Mormon
political identity in the US can partially be explained using primordialism.
According to David J. Samuels, primordialism is “an approach to understanding
political identity which assumes that identities are something people are born
with or that emerge through deep psychological processes early in childhood,
given one’s family and community context” (Samuels 2013, 153). Such an approach
works well with Mormons because family is one of most important aspects of the
LDS Church. Children in LDS homes are exposed very early in life to the
conservative values of the Church, and these values carry over into their
political beliefs and choices later in life. Having grown up in an LDS family,
I can clearly remember my parents voting for Republican leaders and supporting
Republican policies, based on their similarity to our conservative standards.
This, in turn, has caused me to think like a Republican and be more
understanding of that party’s policies. Also, the LDS Church’s conservative
views on issues such as abortion and gay marriage are greatly in line with the
thinking of the Republican Party. This causes many Mormons to vote Republican
in order to express their opinions on such controversial issues.
Primordialsim,
while very useful in explaining why many Mormons support the Republican Party,
does not explain everything. If all Mormons teach the same conservative values
to their children, then why are all Mormons not Republicans? Constructivism is “an
approach to understanding identity which assumes that political identities are
malleable, even if they often appear to be primordial, and suggests that we
think of identity as an evolving political process rather than as a fixed set
of identity categories” (Samuels 2013, 153). Such an approach can explain some
of the questions that a primordial approach raises. Since 2004, support for gay
marriage or allowing civil unions for gays has increased among Utah Mormons by 31%
according to Utah Data Points (Patterson). Taking a constructivist approach, an
observer would see this data as evidence that the Mormon political identity in
the US is indeed malleable. While in 2004 the majority of Utah Mormons did not
support gay marriage, in 2012 the majority did support civil unions or gay
marriage (Patterson). This is a remarkable change to take place in a mere 8
years, and constructivism holds that such a change shows that Mormons can
become more liberal in their thinking.
Harry Reid,
the US Senate Majority leader, is both a Democrat and a Mormon. He once said,
“I am a Democrat because I am a Mormon, not in spite of it” (“Sen. Harry Reid”).
While Mormonism supports many conservative values, not all Mormons have to be
Republican, like Reid implies. Many Church members are beginning to realize
this, as seen in growing support of gay marriage and civil unions among Mormons
in Utah. While the LDS Church has a strong Republican identity right now, which
seems very primordial, I believe that the Mormon political identity is evolving
and will become more Democratic in the future.
Works Cited
Patterson, Kelly.
“Public Opinion on Gay Marriage in Utah.” Utah Data Points. http://utahdatapoints.com/2012/07/public-opinion-on-gay-marriage-in-utah/
(accessed October 11, 2012).
“Political
Neutrality.” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Newsroom. http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/official-statement/political-neutrality
(accessed October 11, 2012).
Samuels, David. Comparative Politics. Upper Saddle
River: Pearson, 2013. (accessed October 11, 2012).
“Sen. Harry Reid
speaks of faith, family and public service.” Brigham Young University. http://news.byu.edu/archive07-Oct-reidspeech.aspx
(accessed October 11, 2012).
I like the specific examples you used. They added strength to your argument. Good job.
ReplyDelete